Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp
Frisco, CO
Hands-on history lessons and outdoor adventures spark curiosity in young archaeologists
- Ages
- 8–12
- Weeks offered
- 2
- Price
- $150/wk
- Financial aid
- Available
About this camp
Participants will head outdoors to explore local landscapes, visit archaeological sites, and participate in hands-on activities designed to spark curiosity, build confidence, and inspire a passion for history.
FillTheWeek Camp Score
D50/100
- Data completeness35.0 / 40
- Safety & accreditation0.0 / 35
- Value vs. category median15.0 / 15
Updated nightly from the latest listing data and verified parent reviews.
Sessions & dates
Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp
Ages 8–12- Jun 8 – Jun 1209:00–17:00Availability unknown$150/wk
- Jun 15 – Jun 1909:00–17:00Availability unknown$150/wk
- Jun 8 – Jun 12Availability unknownPrice varies
Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp: parent FAQ
- What ages does Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp accept?
- Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp serves campers ages 8–12.
- How much does Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp cost?
- Sessions are listed at $150 per week. Confirm current pricing with the provider before registering.
- When does Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp run?
- Sessions run from June 8 through June 19.
- Where is Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp located?
- Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp is located in Frisco, CO.
- Does Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp offer financial aid or scholarships?
- Yes — at least one program lists financial aid or scholarships. Apply or ask directly through the provider.
Ask about this camp
AI answers based on the public listing. Always confirm specifics with the provider.
Parent reviews
Sign in to share your experience with this camp.
Loading reviews…
Camp and activity details can change. Always confirm final dates, prices, availability, and registration details with the provider.
Are you the owner of Frisco Youth Summer Archaeology Camp? Claim this listing to keep details current.
See something wrong, outdated, or missing?
